|
It's con season and Mythopoeia is hitting the road again! We'll be attending the following conventions: Emerald City Comic Con: March 2nd - 5th, 2017 WonderCon Anaheim: March 31st - April 2nd, 2017 C2E2: April 21st - 23rd, 2017 Phoenix Comic Con: May 25th to 28th 2017 We're still in talks with a couple of other shows, so stay tuned to find out where else we'll be! Have a show that you want to recommend? Leave a comment below!
As an indie comic creator, I'm always looking for ways to make my job easier, more inspiring, and of course more profitable. These are just a few resources that I've discovered over the last couple years that I couldn't have lived without. Each resources targets a specific area of development.
1. ART
Every Frame a Painting
Every Frame a Painting is an amazing YouTube channel with educational analysis on the art of editing and cinematography. Though its focus is on cinema, the visual storytelling principles contained within should benefit both comic writers and artists when it comes to framing their works. Here's just one video of many on the channel that I've found interesting and helpful: 2. DISCOURSE
SKTCHD
http://sktchd.com SKTCHD is/was a comic journalism site run by David Harper with an emphasis on longform content. Though David no longer puts out new articles, his archive remains a valuable resource for indie creators looking to dive a little bit deeper into the whys, hows, and trends of the direct market. David still maintains his podcast Off-Panel, where he interviews professionals from the industry, including less spotlighted (but no less influential) editors and publishers. You'll find the podcast here. 
Harper has kept the SKTCHD website up as an archive.
3. THEORY
INTRO TO SCOTT MCCLOUD
https://understandingcomics177.wordpress.com/ Written as annotations for a college class, this blog provides an excellent overview of some of the concepts contained within Scott McCloud’s Understanding Comics. Designed as a companion piece, the notes explain the basic framework of Scott’s comic theory, the academic standard taught all around the world. 
Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics is an extremely valuable resource for comic creators.
4. PRINT
PRINT NINJA RESOURCE CENTER
http://www.printninja.com/printing-resource-center No other website goes into the nuts and bolts of printing in as well laid out a manner as Print Ninja’s own resource center. The information is written for the printing newbie, and as such takes its time in explaining concepts that are often filled with industry jargon. 
Print Ninja has a ton of printing options.
5. BUSINESS
ZUB TALES - The official blog of Jim Zub
http://www.jimzub.com/ Jim is a well known and successful comic creator who has blogged about both his experiences working with Image and their particular model of creator-owned. He’s very transparent about everything, and has a great archive filled with resources for creators of all levels! 
These are just a couple that we visit on a weekly basis. Have other resources that you use? Share in the comments below!
Hey folks, Vince here! I’m one of the creators of the comic series Skies of Fire and Glow, and just can’t stop talking about stories! Seriously, just ask one of our other creators Ray, who has had to listen to hundreds of story ideas over the years :P But, that’s enough about me. What we’re really here for is to talk about the importance of paneling in a comic. What is a Panel? Just so we’re on the same page, we first need to define what a panel is in comics. According to Merriam-Webster, a comic panel is: a frame of a comic strip. a frame of a comic strip… Well, that doesn’t help much. Why is it limited to a comic strip?!? Needless to say, we need a better definition for what a comic panel is. Luckily, I stumbled upon quite an adequate one on Wikipedia of all places: A panel is an individual frame, or single drawing, in the multiple-panel sequence of a comic strip or comic book. A panel consists of a single drawing depicting a frozen moment. This is a lot better than the Merriam-Webster one for sure! Doesn’t limit a panel to a frame, or a comic strip! Not really sure about the “depicting a frozen moment” part though. Below is a panel from issue #1 of Glow. Here, Caszy and Koken tag-team to capture a contraption that is on the fritz. As you can see, we follow the actions of Caszy by “ghosting” her movements across frame. Since you see multiple moments using this technique, wouldn’t this image NOT be considered a panel according to our definition?  Since we have disproven that statement, let’s settle on the definition below: A panel is an individual frame, or single drawing, in the multiple-panel sequence of a comic strip or comic book. Perfect! Simple, and to the point. Panels are the smallest “beat” of a comic. If you think of a story that is made up of three acts, these can be broken down into scenes, which can be further broken down into panels (in the case of comics). This is where the play-by-play happens. One panel can be an action/cause, swiftly followed by the next panel, being the reaction/effect. By stringing together a selection of well-placed panels, you can create an action-packed fight sequence, or quietly reveal deep secrets between two characters in a conversation. For the cinematically inclined, one can compare panels to individual shots in a scene. Hitchcock said it best in an interview, where simply juxtaposing similar shots in different ways, the director can create different scenarios in the viewer’s mind.  Here we see Hitchcock smiling at a lady and child - Sympathetic Old Man.  Here are the same shots of Hitchcock, replacing the lady and child with a woman in a bikini - Dirty Old Man? You decide. Using this simple example, you can see the power of paneling. These basic blocks of storytelling are vital in transmitting information to the audience in a visual and fresh way. You don’t need any words, simply order the panels in a way that the reader can infer something about the character or moment. Now that we know what a panel is and its value in the medium, let’s jump into the history of panels, their cultural variances, and some tips on developing an awesome story through them. History of Panels (Yay…) Believe it or not, panels are older than comic books. Since the dawn of painting and art, artists have had to tackle the big problem of how to visually represent time? The solution? Create panels. Separate the images so people can follow them visually and generate the story in their minds. Some of the earliest examples can be found in Egyptian Hieroglyphs, as well as Greek and Roman sculptures and friezes. One of my favorites is Trajan’s Column. It depicts the victory of Rome over the Dacian people.  The story spirals around the column, and viewers can “read” the story by starting at the bottom of the spiral and snaking upwards. Though there are no distinct cuts between panels, the imagery helps the reader determine when an event ends and another begins. These early forms of paneling were crucial in visual story development. It gave guidelines to the viewer on how to digest the story. These advancements can still be felt today. As the Ancient Greeks and Romans wrote left to right, their visual stories were also designed to be read in the same direction. Today, western comics still adhere to this tradition, with readers reading from the top left, to the bottom right. In Asia, the movement was in reverse, hence manga and other Eastern comic literature must be read from top right to bottom left.  Reading comics: West vs. East During the Medieval Ages, up until the 1700s, comics and panels didn’t see much major advancement in Europe. Due to the exhausting engraving/art techniques, visual storytelling was often relegated to single-panel images. They were simply visual additions to the written narratives of books. In Asia, however, cultures were developing towards more detailed and comprehensive sequential art. Lots can be said about this period, but that’s for another time. By the 19th and 20th centuries, new printing and art techniques pushed comics towards what we are more familiar with. Comic strips (stories contained within four panels or less) became a staple in newspapers. Terms like “panels” that make up “sequential art” were coined by Will Eisner and other creative giants of the era. Entire comic books were being created, and a new industry was born. In this period, cinema also found its foothold in the world. Being both visual mediums, filmmaking and comics went hand in hand. Storyboarding became a helpful tool for filmmakers to visualize movies. Comic artists and creators often utilized film footage to help their drawings and panel work. Walt Disney married the two mediums though animation. Indeed, a story of panels is as much one of cinema as it is for comics. Over time, artists learned to create new meaning, moods, and ideas through the panel. Not only were panels used as a technical tool keep the story moving, it became an artistic tool to emotionally charge the story. Panel Size (Super-Size Me!) Unlike cinema, comics aren’t limited by the size of the screen. While most movies now adhere to some form of frame size (16:9, 2.35:1), comics have the distinct difference of creating panels of varying sizes. You can have a Splash Page (full page panel), or perhaps a selection of consecutive box panels (like a comic strip). The options are limited only by the page. There is no right or wrong when picking a panel size. Art is subjective, and artists often have to deal with varying requirements or constraints. Nevertheless, there is a basic language when it comes to panel sizes. With Size, the main value comes in pacing the story. This deals with how much art the reader’s eye has to digest before moving on to the next image. A Splash Page, for example would technically take up the same viewing time as a selection of smaller panels in the same space. The splash would therefore be a longer “time beat” as you focus your time on only one image. Splashes are great for establishing shots, or wrapping up a scene. They give the reader a moment to set the scene, or digest what they’ve just read.  A splash page from Tintin: Land of Black Gold compared to a standard Tintin page. Tintin comics are known for their “boxy” panelling. However, this splash page really emphasizes the plight of Tintin and his friends as they march hopelessly through the empty desert. Smaller panels give the reader less time to view the art, quickening the pace of the sequence. Smaller panels are great to accelerate the pace for a fight sequence, or a moment of tension (think Sergio Leone showdowns). Throw in some extreme-close-ups and you’ve got yourself a brawl.  Two pages from Frank Miller’s 300. Notice the usage of small panels to emphasize the quick blows in the shot. Overlapping the panels give an added feeling of haste. Knowing how to pace your comic between splash pages, half-splashes, and sporadic mini-panels is an art in of itself. Not only does it need to work visually on the page, but it shouldn’t feel too quick or too slow between panels either. One technique that plays on panel sizes is the fade to black or white. As in the example below from Wicked + Divine, you can visually represent a cinematic fade by shortening the panel boxes until it’s nothing but white or black. It’s a nice touch to slow a reader’s pace to a halt and prime them to start a new scene.  Panel Shape (Going Full Circle) Defining panel shapes is another great way to imbue your story with tension and feeling. Though box panels tend to be a pervading force in comics and its history (think Tintin), artists have continually tried to push these boundaries for different effects. The slanted, or canted, panel style is a great example of design for emotion. As humans, we like things to be straight, whether horizontally or vertically. When something is a bit off, it sets off alarms. Our brain kicks into gear - “Wait, are we off balance? Something’s not right…” A staple in horror movies, we can translate this into comics not only by the image, but also by the shape of the panel.  An example from Katsuhiro Otomo’s Akira. Notice that all the panels are slanted. Coupled with canted imagery, the result is unsettling. But it doesn’t end there. Wanna really bring on the creep? What about panels without straight lines? This kind of panelling can be found in Sandman.  How artists frame their images is almost as important as the images themselves. They play to the aesthetic or the story. Dream sequences might not have any borders, instead allowing different images to melt into one another to become a confusing mess. As we saw in the Sandman example, crooked lines can create tension. But, using the same technique, another artist can create a sense of childish naivete to match their style.  Cul de Sac by Richard Thompson How can the same technique create two different outcomes? Do we need to refine our definitions, or is there more at work? I like to think the latter is true.
Panel shapes and size are simply variables with limitless combinations and designs. By understanding the basics, artists can think outside the box (see what I did there? :D) and come up with new ways to inspire the reader to think and understand. That’s All Folks… For Now. There is so much more that can be discovered about panels and what you can put inside them (or even between them!). But, that’s for another time. People have spent their entire lives on the subject and there are many books out there that can give you a more detailed insight on the subject matter. The Five C’s of Cinematography by Joseph V. Mascelli is a great book for the technically and theoretically inclined. Yes, it’s a filmmaker's book, but since a ton of comics are making their way to the silver screen, it’s probably the more suitable choice. Also, check out the Visual Language Lab. This guy puts the science into art and it's all really cool! Till next time, Vince out ;) When you read a comic, do you look at the pictures or words first? I love asking this question to everyone I meet. For the longest time I was under the assumption that everyone viewed comics the same way I did growing up: reading the words first, followed by the pictures. Sure, good art was important to me, but words were the thing about a comic. Sometimes I’d go entire issues or trades barely looking at the images, letting the dialogue and narration of a story carry me through. Vince, on the other hand, grew up experiencing comics in the inverse; he would scan the image before the words. I didn’t know that until it was brought up in conversation one day while working on Skies of Fire. Before then, it never occurred to me that people would have different ways of experiencing the medium.  Skies of Fire #2, Page 11, Panel One. So is one way inherently better than the other? I think if you ask most people they would say of course not! But then how about this question: does the way you experience comics affect your taste in them? And the followup: How? A good example I like to use is Geoff Darrow’s Shaolin Cowboy, a comic we at Mythopoeia adore. It’s tremendously detailed yet almost bereft of words. Instead, the comic focuses on beat by beat action storytelling that rivals any great Kung Fu flick.  Shaolin Cowboy sure is pretty. On the back of the hardcover of Shaolin Cowboy is the following quote by The Comic Pusher: “This feels like simple, hollow artistic masturbation in four colors, stapled with a barcode for the suckers to lose three fifty on.” (The Comic Pusher actually has really awesome and thoughtful content. Wish he would still update!) It’s displayed proudly next to unrelenting praise by comic luminaries Mike Mignola, Stan Sakai, and a slew of others. Did the reviewer from The Comic Pusher simply not get it? Or is it that hes simply used to experiencing comics differently? That’s what I thought anyway when I read the quote.  Few comics try to capture such a short amount of time in such vivid detail. It’s funny because I think maybe ten years ago I would’ve agreed with him, but having started making my own comics I find myself aligning with that more visually-driven style. Both Glow and Skies of Fire are image-first books where we very consciously try to let the visuals do the heavy lifting. Why do we do make comics like this? Well, a lot has to do with our training. Both Vince and I went to film school, where the first lesson they teach you is that a story should be able to be understood strictly through images. Our professors taught us that if we were to mute a movie, we should still more or less be able to figure out what’s going on. We’ve made no secret that our projects began life as screenplays or teleplays.  Skies of Fire #2, Page 11, Panel Three. Comics are not movies, as a lot of our critics like to point out :). And of course there are a lot of ways to combine pictures and words. One of the limitations in the way of creating comics like we do is that for the most part our wordplay tends to be limited towards spoken dialogue or sound effects. There’s a lot more interesting ways to push the interaction between words and pictures in interesting ways. Our friend Greg Needham’s Mixed Signals comes to mind:  A brilliant page from Greg's Mixed Signals that plays on the interaction between words and pictures. Regardless, I’m not writing to defend or vilify any artist’s style. People are free to create and enjoy what they want, and it’s that rich tapestry of variety that makes comics -- and all art, for that matter -- beautiful. Pictures or words. Which one do you look at first? And have you ever tried it the other way around?  Skies of Fire #2, Page 11, Panel Four to Six. |
Find something...
Categories
|
